You learn almost everything to learn about The Witcher Hero Geralt (Henry Cavill) in a few minutes in the first episode. Titular Witcher – the monster monster for a work with some auxiliary superpowers – is first seen in a swamp, almost killed by a giant spider monster, beaten and almost drowned. In the next scene, Geralt goes to a local pub to know his next discovery, only to be ridiculed and insulted by the villagers who fear his supernatural nature. Finally, she escapes a brokerage thanks to a helpful young woman who quickly becomes a romantic partner.
Netflix’s adaptation grabs the esoteric hero completely. He is struggling to survive in a world that hates him, stubbornly sticking to the moral code that compels him into dangerous situations. He is grueling and sarcastic, always down to battle, impossibly attractive and often irresistible. It’s a premise that has done a good job as a book and video game – and now it’s one of the best series on Netflix.
This review includes light spoilers.
The diaper is based on a series of fictional novels of Polish writer Andrzej Sapkowski, which reached a new level of global popularity for a series of video games. 2015’s The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, in particular, led the franchise to a blockbuster position. Every trip is part of an ancient and dwindling line of geralt, monster hunterknown as witch. They are mutated from an early age and are strong and fast, and this process limits them to limited magical potential and long life span. Geralt is a gunman type, who sneaks into a city in trouble, kills the inevitable magical beast, collects his salary, and moves forward.
In this way, The Witcher is different from most fictional stories, including clear contemporaries such as Game of Thrones. It has elements of a huge epic story – including a lot of political machines and a lot of warring states – but at its best, The Witcher is like a singular fantasy series, in which Geralt is investigating dangerous dangerous creatures and essentially too large Being drawn into conspiracies.
The way the new show works so well is that it blends together these two types of storytelling. There is an interesting comprehensive story. In addition to Geralt, the show includes Giri, a young princess with mysterious powers, fleeing the rival empire, and Yenifer, an independent independent sorceress with grand ambitions. Visitors essentially follow intertin along their three paths. But the reputation rather than serial is in favour of television, for most of its time, near The Witcher0 “Creature of the Week0 The structure is more. (This change occurs in the final two episodes, as the season moves towards a conclusion that very clearly sets the second season.) )
Each episode – many of which are clearly based on short stories from books – work geralt with solving a different monster-related problem, whether it’s a princess turning into an animal, or a vengeful djinn who made her best friends Be cursed, bard dandelion (which is mainly gone by Jaskir on the show). The structure seems right for the spirit of the series, while it works well for television as well.
This also means that the show demands a little more than the audience. The Witcher’s events don’t always appear in chronological order, and there’s no clear indication of whether you’re viewing a scene in the past or present. Instead, you need to unravel the time based on relevant clues: a line about an event that you’ve seen before, or how close two characters have become. (Time detection does not help with the fact that witches and sorceressares are hardly of age.) I had to take a few episodes to get some concrete things. This means that The Witcher benefits from looking again and again, where you can pick up small details that are first missed.
The most important part of The Witcher, however, is Geralt himself. I admit: I was terrified to see the early photographs of Henry Cavill in a party city-esque white wig, but he wasn’t liking the role at all. His geralt is the perfect perfect blend of scary, sexy and sarcastic. Even their gravel voice is perfect. The wig may seem strange at times, but eventually it makes Geralt interesting. You also get to see her in many bathing scenes.
As a TV show, The Witcher is particularly refreshing in an era filled with zeroist fantasy stories inspired by Game of Thrones. Yes, sometimes the show becomes cruel. Surprisingly choreographed battle scenes are extremely violent, as there is a very distinctive and hard-to-magical spell. It’s a show where – flick! -Bad people are usually human beings, not monsters. What is under consideration seems different, however, in the statement. These stories are not full for people, very eager for it; They are making choice based on love or existence, and then things go wrong. What makes the witch so compelling is how it flows into these grey areas, it searches why people do it. Finally, you’ll have some measure of empathy for almost everyone, no matter how unpleasant they are before.
Crucially, The Witcher has a sense of humour. It’s not all dark and horrible. Jasier (Joey Bate) often plays the role of comedy relief, following Geralt’s adventures to sing, sometimes breaking the fourth wall in the process. “I go there again,0 He says at one point, 0 “Just to give exposure.0 When he first meets the witch, the Bard tells him’ “I love him the way you just sit in a corner.0 Geralt’s quietly sarcastic nature is on full display. He can make cuts under any circumstances, no matter how strange or terrifying it is, a frustrated 0 “Fuck0 With “. And one of the show’s most dramatic sex scenes is with a playful jig and making jokes to the audience making jokes.
This Witcher can very easily be wrong. It’s not wrong that it’s wrong that it really makes the series interesting, but tv optimization achieves it. Witcher is strange, intense and inconvenient, and it almost perfectly balances those heterogeneous emotions. Yes, it stares at Henry Cavill in a bad white wig, but as soon as he starts talking, you’ll all forget.